HNewsWire: The vicious attack on farmers and everyone else is part of the globalist strategy to destroy us. They will not be able to redistribute our wealth to poor countries unless they can shut down the global economy, disrupt supply chains and wreak havoc.
At this point, everyone's money is withdrawn and distributed. You will have no property! Like Castro in Cuba!
The problem with the adoption and implementation of a New World Order is that no government has been able and will offer true hope and peace to humanity. When the man expects global peace and optimism from the government, he becomes disillusioned and enslaved by its false promises. History has repeatedly shown that no world quasi-empire has endured due to its inherent weaknesses of greed, corruption, and lust for power.
Those who desire a New World Order, whether secular or religious, are in for an uncomfortable awakening. Regardless of man's brilliance and ingenuity, false religious teachings cannot produce utopia. Only Heaven can offer peace of mind and long-term satisfaction. The Bible makes it clear that all aspects of this physical existence, including pain, decay, calamity, and death, will endure (2 Corinthians 4:16; Hebrews 9:27).
It is also evident that none of this exists in the heavenly city (Revelation 21:3-7 and Revelation 22). They will be removed. Yes, hope is necessary. But what we need is hope for heaven, not false hope for a New World Order. Heaven is the only hope for all believers (John 14:1-4). It does not exist on this planet.
The ramifications of what critics have described as a global "war" against farmers and ranchers are becoming clearer. But even as food shortages worsen, governments, including the Biden administration, are cracking down on agricultural production.
Experts and lawmakers who spoke to The Epoch Times warned that it is time to rein in government policies that hurt the poor the most. A Republican congressman said a GOP-led congress would start work immediately after taking control.
While the attacks on agriculture and related industries look different in different countries, many experts say it is a coordinated global policy that pursues theUnited Nations(ON), itworld economic forum(World Economic Forum), the European Union (EU) and other international forces determined to transform civilization.
In July, The Epoch Times published a lengthy investigative article quoting several professionals in the field who said United Nations-backed climate change and sustainable development policies, which they described as a "war on farmers," are directly responsible. of the climb the food crisis.
The outcome of farmer-focused policies is beginning to become clear as food shortages worsen around the world. Think Sri Lanka on a global scale, at least if current trends continue.
UN leaders and Western officials are openly discussing this. President Joe Biden, for example, earlier this year warned of a “real” food shortage, citing the conflict in Ukraine.
UN worldEssenThe executive director of the program, David Beasley, was in turnusea "devastating" global food shortage since the start of the COVID crisis that could lead to famine of "biblical proportions" in dozens of nations.
"The world needs to wake up to this unprecedented global food crisis and act now to prevent it from spiraling out of control," he told a World Food Day event last month organized by a UN agency run by a Party member. Chinese communist. . (PCC).
As farmers and ranchers come under increasing regulatory pressure, authoritative sources warn that even wealthy countries like the US could face problems in the food supply chain and other critical sectors in the coming months. .
Lead in Europe
The cracks in the system are becoming increasingly apparent in Europe. With rising prices, more and more items are missing from supermarket shelves. In the United Kingdom and Germany, shortages in stores growit was newsfor weeks.
Many nations around the world, especially in the Middle East and Africa, are already facing major food crises. And with United Nations-backed "sustainable" government and financial sector policies decimating energy systems and agricultural production, the pain is likely to increase, experts say.
It's particularly hard for the poor, said Dr. E. Calvin Beisner, president of the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, who has criticized an anti-agriculture policy ostensibly aimed at combating climate change.
“Banning or reducing the use of nitrous fertilizers in the name of fighting global warming is absurd,” he told The Epoch Times, citing policies adopted by governments around the world in response to the United Nations endorsement.
"Nitrogen oxides are a small player in the overall greenhouse effect, dwarfed a hundred times by carbon dioxide and a thousand times by water vapor," Beisner continues.
“The infrared wavelengths at which nitrogen oxides are absorbed are already almost completely absorbed. Therefore, they can only make a negligible contribution to global warming."
“But their contribution to human well-being is immense, as they multiply agricultural production per hectare, per hour worked, and per capital income, making food more plentiful and cheaper for all,” Beisner, a senior Christian official, added. on environmental issues. "The poor benefit more than anyone."
"The war against the peasants is a war against the poor," he concluded.
war against peasants
The war against the peasants was clearly visible in the Netherlands, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Canada, and many other nations, including the United States.
In public, political subterfuges include saving the planet from supposedly man-made climate change, tackling a host of other environmental problems, improving economic efficiency, and even handing over land to “indigenous” peoples. However, critics say the real motivation appears to be much darker.
The ultimate goal of powerful international actors, according to international organizations such as the World Economic Forum, behind many of the policies that lead to food insecurity is the restructuring of all elements of life on planet Earth.
From rethinking private property rights to crafting a "new social contract," everything must be redesigned, World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab and his organization have sparred for years while pushing for what they call the "great reset."
But not everyone is on board.
Legal Ranchers Action Fund, United Stock Growers of America, or R-CALF USA for short, represents ranchers and ranchers across the country. The group warns of the dangers of the agenda of the United Nations and the World Economic Forum.
"What's happening is that the globalists have an agenda that's best pursued by aiming for the low-hanging fruit," R-CALF' USA CEO Bill Bullard said in an interview with The Epoch Times, saying the trend was apparent. when the Dutch government declared war. on the peasants of this nation.
"They are targeting the segment of agribusiness that has less capacity to absorb these additional regulatory costs," he said. "If governments enforce these policies, those who can bear these additional costs are the big agribusinesses, not the small ones."
"This is an attempt to eliminate independent farmers and ranchers from around the world," Bullard said, noting that governments and international organizations are working together on this effort.
“Ranchers and ranchers and ranchers are on the front line; They are targeted because they are easy to kill.”
Bullard pointed to several Biden administration policies directed at farmers, saying that if this is not stopped, "we will see farmers and ranchers drop like flies."
The ultimate goal, Bullard continued, is to encourage "the consolidation and centralization of food production by transnational global elites: international courts, the World Economic Forum, and everyone else."
“All of this stems from the UN Sustainable Development Agenda, the 2030 Agenda, Agenda 21 and the multinationals involved in influencing and collaborating with the UN,” he added.
R-CALF USA President Brett Kenzie also weighed in, saying "global elites" promote "sustainability," which he described as "the ultimate fake idol worship label" meant to instill piety in all of us.
"All they want is everything, and their ability to live off their private property will be the first casualty," Kenzie added.
As The Epoch Times wrote in a recent article titled “UN and World Economic Forum behind global 'war on farmers': Experts', a set of 'Sustainable Development Goals' (SDGs) of the UN 2030 Agenda are directly related to the global war on farmers.
The goals, developed with the help of the CCP and enacted by governments around the world, call for drastic changes in agriculture, production, and even consumption. They have been regularly cited by governments in developing the very policies that many well-informed parties blame for the food crisis.
The World Economic Forum, for its part, signed an official "strategic partnership" with the UN with the aim of incorporating large companies from around the world into the movement to impose the objectives of the 2030 Agenda on the planet.
The text of the agreement promises to "deepen institutional commitment and jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development."
United Nations-backed government policies targeting the energy sector are also playing a role in growing food shortages, experts said.
For example, Europe's efforts to phase out reliable energy sources, including hydrocarbon power and nuclear power, are having a devastating impact on European industry.
Fertilizer production, a key agricultural input, was particularly affected. Due to the increase in fertilizer prices, food production has been affected as food prices are skyrocketing all over the world.
In the United States, the Biden administration, bureaucracies and Congress are also focusing on agriculture and energy.
The Anti-Inflation Law, for example, will make taxpayers pay farmers for not doing sofarm yardunder the guise of implementing crop rotation of "climate friendly" agricultural crops.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also upset farmers across the country with a proposed regulation that would require them to track emissions when doing business with a public company.
It's not just the government. Major banks and investment managers around the world have also aligned themselves with UN policies that are contributing to the food crisis.
In fact, a coalition of 19 attorneys general from mostly Republican states is investigating possible collusion between the six largest banks in the US and the UN's Net-Zero Banking Alliance.
As participants in the UN program, the banks agree to aim for "net zero" emissions by 2050 by ending or slashing investments in and lending to traditional energy producers and agricultural interests.
Several state corporations involved in the investigation told The Epoch Times that these "collusions" by US banks with the UN would undermine US agriculture and industry and benefit the Chinese communist regime.
“Our own money is being used as a weapon against us,” West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore told The Epoch Times in August as he cracked down on megabanks for targeting key industries.
US lawmakers are also increasingly concerned about targeting agricultural producers with government policies and pressure from financial services companies.
US Rep. John Rose (R-Tenn.) owns and operates a farm that has been in his family for more than 230 years. He also served as Tennessee's agriculture commissioner before being elected to Congress in 2012.
Concerned about the overregulation of farmers and the "very real threat of food shortages," Rose organized her fellow congressmen to make their voices heard.
In the first letter to the SEC chairman, Rose and more than 115 members of Congress called on the agency to reject the proposed "significant and impractical regulatory burden" on agriculture.
In the second letter, Rose and nearly all of the Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee pointed to the recent Supreme Court ruling against the EPA setting emission limits for electricity generation as evidence that the SEC lacked authority to proceed.
In an interview with The Epoch Times, Rose said that if Republicans retake the House, they intend to unleash "aggressive" oversight and curb regulatory abuses against agriculture and other sectors.
"I don't think this policy is necessary or appropriate," he said, noting that there is a link to the UN agenda and that the pressure being put on farmers is "very worrying."
“We see the Biden administration using regulatory force to promote this green agenda,” Rose continued.
In addition to the SEC's proposed emissions report that will destroy small farms, Rose pointed to the Biden administration's efforts to expand federal control of water resources by expanding the definition of "America's waters."
"EPA has taken very aggressive action against necessary crop protection products used by farmers, including suspending access after farmers purchased supplies," he said. "That's not helpful."
"I deal directly with farmers who are being prosecuted for regulatory abuses that federal agencies have historically inflicted on America's Waters policies during the Obama years," Rose said. "It's a really chilling effect on agricultural production."
The end result of this kind of anti-farmer policy, he said, will be "persistent shortages and delayed production around the world."
It was also all "self-inflicted," the congressman added.
"We have to recognize that we cannot implement policies that lead to scarcity of something as important as food," he said, calling it "obvious" and noting that farmers must continue to feed the world.
"This is all a formula for world hunger," Rose said.
The same applies to the energy sector, he said, citing disincentives to explore and develop resources.
"There's no point in burying your head in the sand on these issues," he said.
"Everyone is concerned about the environment, but this religious fervor where they have made environmental concerns a mantra to live by is a huge mistake," Rose added, calling for "balance."
But when the Republican Party takes control of both houses of Congress in January, "we will see a decidedly concerted effort to exercise proper oversight of the Biden administration and various regulators, including financial services," he said.
"We will have strict and vigorous supervision," he continued, saying that transparency and control of abuse would be a key focus.
"You're going to see aggressive moves on all of these fronts," Rose said, pointing to legislation and the use of finance as possible tools to prevent the government from "deliberately damaging" the US economy and agriculture in particular.
"In the end, there is enormous pressure."
Foreign allies should be "encouraged" not to make the same political "mistake" that Biden is making, leading to food and energy shortages, Rose said.
“The production capacity to feed the world is there; in fact, it is growing every year. We have shown that we can feed the world,” she said. "But to do that, we have to move forward and we can't tie our hands behind our backs, which is what Biden and a lot of the international people interested in green initiatives are trying to do."
"Maybe that's what they want," he added. "One of the most common questions I get from voters is: 'What is the hidden agenda?'"
“People understand that if you don't produce oil and you don't have a substitute, what happens? They have blackouts, California-style blackouts; orders not to load your car," he said. "It's not practical. The economic ripples this creates lead to things like scarcity, including food shortages. We cannot allow that.
Biden and the UN responses
As food shortages deepen, Western politicians, including Biden, have already offered some strong indications of how they will respond.
Amid soaring energy prices that experts say his policies have caused, Biden, who sounds more like a Venezuelan strongman than a US president, has repeatedly accused companies of "profit making." .
In response to the fertilizer shortage, USAID Administrator Samantha Power welcomed what she called a "positive coating."
"The fertilizer shortage is real now," he told ABC News. "As a result, we're working with countries to think about natural solutions like manure and compost, and that can speed up the transition, which would ultimately be in the best interest of farmers."
Sri Lankan farmers tried this in response to a UN-backed fertilizer ban by the local socialist government, and it ended in disaster.
Ironically, the UN, which has long endorsed climate and sustainable development policies that experts blame for food problems around the world, is now portraying itself as a response to the crisis.
“The international community has a good sense of how to address the food crisis; What we need now is coordinated action by governments," said Michael Fakhri, "UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food," in a press release, presenting the UN and governments as the solution to the problem that experts say was caused by them.
Fakhri also called on governments to "create the right conditions for a transition to agroecology."
UN Secretary GeneralAnthony Guterres, former leader of the Socialist International, also sounded the alarm about what he called the "global food crisis."
At an event last month hosted by the head of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Qu Dongyu, a CCP member and former regime official, in Beijing, Guterres said that 3 billion people today they cannot afford to eat healthily.
"The number of people affected by famine has more than doubled in the last three years," he said, adding that "nearly a million people live in famine conditions, with starvation and death a daily reality."
"Governments, scientists, the private sector and civil society must work together to make nutritious and affordable food available to all," Guterres said.
The UN and relevant UN agencies have not responded to requests for comment at the time of publication.
American farmers have ample resources to feed every citizen of the United States. Stop putting them out of business Evil Elite Biden and Evil Obama so the super rich and China can buy your country.
What does the World Economic Forum do? ›
The World Economic Forum brings together decision-makers from across society to work on projects and initiatives that make a real difference. Through collaboration between stakeholders with varied perspectives, our projects deliver concrete and sustainable results and make a positive impact at all levels of society.How many countries are in the World Economic Forum? ›
Some 2,700 leaders from 130 countries, including 52 heads of state and government, will be attending the annual meeting in Davos. The World Economic Forum's (WEF) Annual Meeting 2023 will take place from January 16 to 20 in Davos, Switzerland.Who is a member of the World Economic Forum? ›
The managing board is chaired by the WEF's president, Børge Brende, and acts as the executive body of the World Economic Forum. Managing board members are Børge Brende, Julien Gattoni, Jeremy Jurgens, Adrian Monck, Sarita Nayyar, Olivier M. Schwab, Saadia Zahidi, and Alois Zwinggi.How did the World Economic Forum start? ›
The Forum was first conceived in 1971 when a group of European business leaders met in the ski town of Davos, Switzerland to consider the major global issues of the day and to brainstorm on solutions to address these challenges. Since that time, the WEF has grown to occupy a global platform.What is the purpose of World Social Forum? ›
The World Social Forum is held by members of the alter-globalization movement (also referred to as the global justice movement) who come together to coordinate global campaigns, share and refine organizing strategies, and inform each other about movements from around the world and their particular issues.What is the problem with the world economic Forum? ›
The World Economic Forum is a super polluter event
Often travelling very short distances, over a thousand private jets flew in and out of airports serving Davos during the week of the 2022 WEF, causing CO2 emissions four times greater than an average week, equivalent to 350,000 cars.
It is the North American subsidiary of the World Economic Forum, the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, under the supervision of the Swiss Federal Government.Can anyone go to the world economic Forum? ›
The Open Forum welcomes a diverse public from around the globe to listen, participate and share thoughts, experiences and stories with the panellists on pressing and controversial issues.Who runs the world economy? ›
The IMF monitors the international monetary system and global economic developments to identify risks and recommend policies for growth and financial stability. The Fund also undertakes a regular health check of the economic and financial policies of its 190 member countries.How do you get invited to the world Economic Forum? ›
Membership is by invitation only and a result of a diligent review of selection criteria. Typical Forum Members exceed their industry standards in a variety of metrics, are interested in their role as a global citizen and have a track record of outstanding leadership, setting the bar for business best practices.
How much does it cost to be a member of the world Economic Forum? ›
The Forum offers different levels of membership and partnership, tailored to the level of engagement that meets the strategic needs of our members and partners. Membership and partnership fees range from CHF60,000 to CHF600,000 depending on the level of engagement.What are the policies of World Economic Forum? ›
The World Economic Forum adheres to the principles of independence, impartiality, moral integrity and intellectual integrity. These principles are of utmost importance to the safeguarding of the Forum's mission, reputation and status.What were the main concerns discussed at the world Social Forum? ›
The WSF emphasizes democratic participation and engagement in dialogues addressing global issues such as social injustices, inequality, sovereignty, and the respect of human rights and the environment. It is an open space for movements and groups of civil society promoting plurality and unity.Who founded the world Economic Forum? ›
Klaus Martin Schwab (German: [klaʊs ˈmaʁtiːn ʃvaːp]; born 30 March 1938) is a German engineer, economist and founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF). He has acted as the WEF's chairman since founding the organisation in 1971.Why is the forum important? ›
Forums are a powerful tool to help teams work together to publish new documents. What started off as a simple discussion around new ideas, can often evolve into valuable knowledge which could be used to the benefit of the whole business.What is the purpose of a forum meeting? ›
In a public forum, also referred to as a town meeting, community members discuss a wide range of important issues. They are often held to identify and solve problems.What is the role of the Global Policy Forum? ›
Global Policy Forum (GPF) is an independent policy watchdog that monitors and reports on United Nations activities and developments in multilateral affairs. GPF is convinced that active civic participation is needed to defend and strengthen rights-based multilateralism and international governance institutions.What is the theme of the world Economic Forum meeting that is going to be held in Davos in January 2022? ›
Event: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2022 | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD. The 52nd World Economic Forum Annual Meeting will convene on the theme, 'Working Together, Restoring Trust,' with the aim to address economic, environmental, political, and social fault-lines exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.What companies are involved with the world Economic Forum? ›
- A. ABB Accenture Adani Group Adecco Group African Rainbow Minerals Agility AIG. ...
- B. Bahrain Economic Development Board Bain & Company Banco Bradesco Bank of America Barclays. ...
- C. Capgemini Chevron Cisco Citi. ...
- D. Dell Technologies Deloitte Dentsu Group. ...
- E. EY.
- G. Goldman Sachs. ...
- H. ...
Bill Gates - Agenda Contributor | World Economic Forum.
What is global economy in your own words? ›
Global economy can be defined as the sum of activities that take place both within a country and between different countries. Each country is a separate unit, with its own industrial production, labor market, financial market, resources and environment.How does the global economy affect us? ›
In general, globalization decreases the cost of manufacturing. This means that companies can offer goods at a lower price to consumers. The average cost of goods is a key aspect that contributes to increases in the standard of living. Consumers also have access to a wider variety of goods.Who controls the economy in government? ›
Governments influence the economy by changing the level and types of taxes, the extent and composition of spending, and the degree and form of borrowing. Governments directly and indirectly influence the way resources are used in the economy.Was Elon Musk invited to the world Economic Forum? ›
DAVOS, Switzerland (AP) — The World Economic Forum says billionaire Elon Musk wasn't on the guest list for the annual meeting of business executives, global leaders and cultural trend-setters in Davos, Switzerland — despite what the Twitter owner claims.What are the benefits of joining the world Economic Forum? ›
We offer competitive salaries determined by role and level, and a comprehensive benefits package including generous health and retirement contributions. The Forum also promotes and supports staff health and well-being, and wants to make its mission a reality in their daily environment.Who are the members of World Economic Forum 2022? ›
Notable members include prime ministers Jacinda Ardern and Sanna Marin, President Carlos Alvarado Quesada of Costa Rica, entrepreneurs Iyinoluwa Aboyeji and Rhea Mazumdar Singhal, peace activist Victor Ochen, and economist Esther Duflo.What are the main economic policies? ›
- 1 Fiscal and monetary policies. Fiscal policies include government expenditure, taxes and subsidies. ...
- 2 Trade and exchange rate polices. ...
- 3 Labour and employment policies. ...
- 4 Investment and foreign aid. ...
- 5 Population policies. ...
- 6 Incomes and equity policies.
The United States relies on two types of policies to shape the economy: fiscal and monetary. Fiscal policy is used to influence the aggregate demand in a country, whereas monetary policy is used to control the amount of money available throughout the economy.What are the five goals of economic policy? ›
The five economic policy objectives of sustainable economic growth, price stability, full employment, equitable distribution of income and efficient allocation of resources are interrelated.What is the meaning of social forum? ›
A social forum is an open meeting place for civil society organizations and individuals opposed to neoliberalism and what its participants regard as the domination of the world by capital and imperialism. The first social forum was the World Social Forum (WSF) held in January 2001 in Porto Alegre.
Where was the most recent World Economic Forum held? ›
Davos, Switzerland, is where the World Economic Forum holds its annual meeting. Delegates from many sectors converge for several days of talks and meetings to address urgent global issues. Davos is a modest ski resort near Zurich, Switzerland.Where is the world Social Forum 2022 held? ›
The 2022 Social Forum is convened as a contribution to the UN 2023 Water Conference, to be held during 22-24 March 2023 in New York.Can anyone go to World Economic Forum? ›
The Open Forum welcomes a diverse public from around the globe to listen, participate and share thoughts, experiences and stories with the panellists on pressing and controversial issues.How much does it cost to be a member of the world economic Forum? ›
The Forum offers different levels of membership and partnership, tailored to the level of engagement that meets the strategic needs of our members and partners. Membership and partnership fees range from CHF60,000 to CHF600,000 depending on the level of engagement.What does World Economic Forum publish? ›
State of the Connected World 2023 Edition
The World Economic Forum with the Council on the Connected World produce the only publication that tracks governance gaps related to the Internet of Things (...
It is the North American subsidiary of the World Economic Forum, the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, under the supervision of the Swiss Federal Government.Does the world Economic Forum work with the UN? ›
Detroit, USA, 13 October 2022 – The World Economic Forum and UN-Habitat today launched the Global Partnership for Local Investment to accelerate public-private collaboration and resourcing of urban initiatives that advance the 2030 Sustainable Development and New Urban Agenda.Is Bill Gates a member of the world Economic Forum? ›
Misleading. Bill Gates was never confirmed to be part of the 2023 conference of the World Economic Forum, a spokesperson for his foundation said. This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our work to fact-check social media posts here.Which reports are released by World Economic Forum? ›
Global Gender Gap Report, Global Risk Report, and the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report are the reports published by WEF.